missing translation for 'onlineSavingsMsg'
Learn More
Learn More
Kimberly-Clark™ Kimtech™ Sterling™ Nitrile Ambidextrous Gloves
missing translation for 'orderingAttributeHoverText'
Size:
X-Small
Small
Medium
Large
X-Large
Description
- Assured Compliance:
- PPE Cat III according to Regulation (EU) 2016/425,
- EN ISO 374-1:2016 Type C (K) Chemical Splash protection,
- EN 374-4:2003 Resistance to degradation by chemicals,
- EN ISO 374-5:2016 Micro Organism and VIRUS Protection
- Food contact approved
- Manufactured using proprietary Sterling™ technology that combines security and comfort. The efficient, environmentally-friendly construction minimizes waste without compromising safety.
- Nitrile construction results in products that are stronger and leaner than latex gloves, and feature certified protection against a wide range of contaminants while also being food contact approved.
- Gloves are anti-static tested to protect the wearer and equipment, ambidextrous and gray in color.
- Textured fingertips enhance grip and tactile sensitivity for safer and more efficient processes.
- Beaded cuffs add strength to the gloves, reducing the risk of tearing and increasing their durability, while also reducing roll down for easier donning and doffing.
- Contain no natural rubber latex, silicone or powder, reducing the risks of skin irritation for the wearer.
Specifications
Specifications
Certifications/Compliance | CE 0120 PPE Category III product classified by EC Council Directive 89/686/EEC, It is tested in accordance with the EN Norms EN 420:2003, AQL level of 1.5 for pinholes, ISO 9001, ISO 16604 |
Classification | PPE Category III |
Accelerator Free | Yes |
Color | Gray |
Disposable | Single-use |
Exterior Finish | Smooth |
Finger Thickness (English) | 3.9 mil |
Finger Thickness (Metric) | 0.1 mm |
Hand | Ambidextrous |
Latex Free | Yes |
Show More |
Product Content Correction
Your input is important to us. Please complete this form to provide feedback related to the content on this product.
Product Title
Spot an opportunity for improvement?Share a Content Correction